DC.ADVISORY / 004
Vendor & EPC Evaluation.
Independent. Vendor-neutral. Owner-aligned.
We assess EPC, MEP, and OEM proposals on the owner's behalf. Commercial terms, technical compliance, schedule realism, and lifecycle cost — separated from the marketing layer.
[ WHO IT SERVES ]
- ›Owners running competitive EPC tenders
- ›Investors validating selected contractor positions
- ›Operators replacing or augmenting incumbent vendors
[ SCOPE OF WORK ]
- ›RFP structuring and evaluation criteria
- ›Technical compliance assessment
- ›Commercial and contractual review
- ›Schedule and resourcing realism review
- ›Total cost of ownership modelling
[ DELIVERABLES ]
What you receive.
Weighted evaluation matrix and recommendation
Technical clarification log with bidder responses
Commercial deltas and risk-adjusted comparison
Negotiation positions per bidder
Award recommendation and dissent register
Post-award handover pack for the owner team
[ WHEN TO ENGAGE ]
Engage before the RFP is issued, not after bids are received. Most evaluations fail because the criteria were written by the eventual winner.
[ REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOMES ]
- →Award changed after schedule realism review surfaced a six-month gap.
- →Lifecycle cost analysis reset the negotiation, recovering material margin.
- →Two parallel awards structured to retain optionality on phased expansion.
We act as the owner's strategic advisor and representative. We are not an engineering contractor, and we are not aligned to any vendor.
Before committing capital, let's talk[ CONTINUE ]