DC.ADVISORY / 002
Site Selection & Land Strategy.
Modelled together.
Most site selection failures are not land failures. They are power energisation, grid connection, and permitting failures discovered late. We model the variables together and rank candidates against weighted, owner-defined criteria.
[ WHO IT SERVES ]
- ›Developers entering new geographies
- ›Hyperscaler tenants underwriting build-to-suit
- ›Funds evaluating land-banked positions
[ SCOPE OF WORK ]
- ›Multi-criteria site evaluation framework
- ›Power availability and connection feasibility
- ›Fibre route and latency assessment
- ›Water, climate, and environmental risk
- ›Planning, permitting, and regulatory navigation
[ DELIVERABLES ]
What you receive.
Weighted scorecard across shortlisted sites
Power and grid connection feasibility memos
Fibre route and latency map
Environmental and planning risk register
Recommended site with defensible rationale
Negotiation positions for land and power
[ WHEN TO ENGAGE ]
Engage before any non-binding offer is signed and before commercial pipeline is allocated to a region. The cost of correcting a poor site is paid every year for the asset's life.
[ REPRESENTATIVE OUTCOMES ]
- →Preferred site changed after grid connection diligence revealed a 30-month energisation gap.
- →Land negotiation re-anchored on permitting risk, reducing acquisition cost.
- →Three campuses selected and approved in under eight weeks.
We act as the owner's strategic advisor and representative. We are not an engineering contractor, and we are not aligned to any vendor.
Before committing capital, let's talk[ CONTINUE ]